← Evidence library

BIB_420

Pathology-report COMPLETENESS (synoptic/structured vs narrative) — fills a real GAP and is TIME-CRITICAL: the 2026-05-26 WLE report drives the ENTIRE downstream framework (staging, TASK24a decision tree, AMBLor eligibility, surveillance cadence, second-opinion trigger), and the evidence shows narrative free-text reports FREQUENTLY OMIT critical prognostic factors. Distinct from BIB407 (which is diagnostic accuracy/discordance — this is completeness of an accurate diagnosis). Actionable: confirm the report is structured/synoptic and contains every decision-driving variable; if any is missing,…

Evidence grade

A

Tier

1 (CAP MIPS measure + RCPath national dataset = operative

Cited by tasks

1, 15, 24, 24a

Identifiers

PMC3864181 · DOI:10.1111/ajd

↗ Follow the original source for full context

Full extracted findings & patient-implication analysis: bibliography/BIB_420/findings.md (research corpus). This page is a short context summary — not individualised medical advice.